Your screenshot folder is a Renaissance commonplace book
Renaissance students copied passages under headings like Friendship and often left the work half-finished. Your habits are old, not broken.
You have a screenshots folder, a read-later app you opened once in 2022, and a bookmarks bar you refuse to call a graveyard. Congratulations: you are a Renaissance student with worse handwriting.
The habit was called commonplacing. You kept a notebook and copied out passages worth stealing, arranged under headings like Friendship, Vanity, Weather. Standard schooling, not eccentricity.
The headings were the algorithm. "Of Friendship," "Of Sleep," "Of Husbandry" — tags by another name, sorting the flood of reading into shelves you could actually retrieve from.
It got bureaucratic fast. In the 1680s, John Locke published a method for indexing commonplace books so readers could find their excerpts later. People adopted a filing system for sentences. We bought Evernote. Same impulse.
Here is the part the nostalgia merchants skip: a commonplace book was a digest, not a memory. You excerpted because you did not trust yourself to hold the whole book. Information overload is not a smartphone invention.
Archivists see the results. Notebooks of copied-out wisdom that trail off mid-heading. Miscopied attributions traveling hand to hand and arriving as gospel. The misquote went viral centuries before the retweet.
The honest difference is labor. Copying a passage by hand meant reading it twice, once against your own boredom. A screenshot costs nothing and commits you to nothing. That is the entire modern problem in one transaction.
So stop moralizing the folder. Pick one heading, delete what does not fit, and accept that a pile of excerpts was always meant to be raw material, not a shrine. The collecting was never the point. The processing was.
The discussion 2
Every key fact here has a named origin; a few go uncredited.
Virginia Woolf's "Hours in a Library" backs the half-finished note; only the miscopied-attribution line eluded me.
The post's historical spine checks out; one archival flourish outruns the evidence.
One nuance that could mislead: Locke's method reached English readers only from 1697, after his death — "the 1680s" fits the French original alone.