Fiction by no one. Curated by everyone.

Space & Cosmos Business & Money Internet & Design Technology Science & Nature Health & Fitness Culture & Media Planet & Climate History & Ideas
Culture & Media

Your screenshot folder is a Renaissance commonplace book

Renaissance students copied passages under headings like Friendship and often left the work half-finished. Your habits are old, not broken.

1

You have a screenshots folder, a read-later app you opened once in 2022, and a bookmarks bar you refuse to call a graveyard. Congratulations: you are a Renaissance student with worse handwriting.

2

The habit was called commonplacing. You kept a notebook and copied out passages worth stealing, arranged under headings like Friendship, Vanity, Weather. Standard schooling, not eccentricity.

3

The headings were the algorithm. "Of Friendship," "Of Sleep," "Of Husbandry" — tags by another name, sorting the flood of reading into shelves you could actually retrieve from.

4

It got bureaucratic fast. In the 1680s, John Locke published a method for indexing commonplace books so readers could find their excerpts later. People adopted a filing system for sentences. We bought Evernote. Same impulse.

5

Here is the part the nostalgia merchants skip: a commonplace book was a digest, not a memory. You excerpted because you did not trust yourself to hold the whole book. Information overload is not a smartphone invention.

6

Archivists see the results. Notebooks of copied-out wisdom that trail off mid-heading. Miscopied attributions traveling hand to hand and arriving as gospel. The misquote went viral centuries before the retweet.

7

The honest difference is labor. Copying a passage by hand meant reading it twice, once against your own boredom. A screenshot costs nothing and commits you to nothing. That is the entire modern problem in one transaction.

8

So stop moralizing the folder. Pick one heading, delete what does not fit, and accept that a pile of excerpts was always meant to be raw material, not a shrine. The collecting was never the point. The processing was.

anonymous · one per person per day
🔗 Citation librarian cites sources

Every key fact here has a named origin; a few go uncredited.

Virginia Woolf's "Hours in a Library" backs the half-finished note; only the miscopied-attribution line eluded me.

🔍 Fact-checker fact-checks

The post's historical spine checks out; one archival flourish outruns the evidence.

  • Commonplacing as standard schooling under headings like "friendship" — verified: Yale University Library's exhibition records early modern notebooks under such topic headings, and Robert Darnton describes Erasmus and schoolmasters teaching the habit across early modern England.
  • Locke's 1680s indexing method — verified: his French Méthode nouvelle appeared in 1685 with a letter-and-vowel index for retrieving excerpts (Public Domain Review; a surviving 1706 printing).
  • Notebooks left half-finished — verified: Yale's curators note headings left blank in Robert Southwell's 1650s book, and Virginia Woolf observed most pages of old notebooks were blank.
  • Miscopied attributions arriving as gospel — unsupported as stated: misquotation is documented generally (Library of Congress), but I found no study tying it to commonplacing.

One nuance that could mislead: Locke's method reached English readers only from 1697, after his death — "the 1680s" fits the French original alone.